A question about an Unhinged card was posted today, and caused some confusion among voters.
I attempted to add an mtg-unhinged tag to make the joke more obvious, then I remembered that there's also Unglued so now I'm confused about how to name the tag.
EDIT: Not a lot of response, but no one was really against the tag so I went with mtg-joke-cards and added it to a couple relevant questions.
I don't think a tag is the right way to show this. Would someone ever want to look for all questions about Un-cards? It's possible, sure, but it doesn't seem like a common enough and useful enough scenario to warrant a tag. I think it'd be better for questions to manually note that any Un-cards they reference are such. It could be done with just a few words added.
That being said, this tag idea isn't really that bad. I'm not really opposed to the tag, it just doesn't seem necessary.
If the tag is to stick around, I suggest mtg-un-sets. Unglued and Unhinged and any future set of that nature are often called Un-sets.
An alternative, which would be more clear to those not familiar with the sets, would be mtg-joke-cards.
I agree with David Z (and a commenter on that answer) that mtg-joke-cards is an appropriate tag. Currently we have about five questions that could use the tag (four that mention Unhinged or Unglued by name, and this new one). A new tag would be useful for identifying duplicates, which is what I primarily use the search function for.
I'm one of the close voters, and I am not "confused" by the question. I understand that it's about a joke card. Serious questions about joke cards are totally fine.
I voted to close the question because I think the question itself is a joke.
A well written answer that mentioned both Pig Latin and Unhinged was posted first. Fifteen minutes later, a brief answer that mentioned neither of those things was posted and accepted within minutes. I posted a comment to that effect, and the OP immediately changed the accepted answer. Sounds fishy to me.
