I think we need to make opening a synonym for openings.
Plural seems the better way to go, and we don't need these two separate tags.
Add a comment
|
answered Jun 9 '11 at 15:23
LittleBobbyTables - Au RevoirLittleBobbyTables - Au Revoir
12.4k1 gold badge11 silver badges11 bronze badges
-
-
Well, I have the votes now, but it looks like one of you guys pushed it through, thanks. – Lance Roberts Jun 9 '11 at 16:16
-
@Lance - yeah, it wasn't immediately obvious how to approve it, but I stumbled my way through :) – LittleBobbyTables - Au Revoir Jun 9 '11 at 16:17
-
While it shows as a tag-synonym on the openings page. If you try to add it to a question, it doesn't have the (s), and it didn't migrate the tags over, so there are still 11 questions with 'opening'. – Lance Roberts Jun 22 '11 at 19:35
-
ok I tried to take care of them all. Since you can't search for a synonymed tag, I can't be sure. – Lance Roberts Jun 23 '11 at 20:50
-
@LanceRoberts Its over 3 years since this issue was raised, questions can still have one or both of the tags. Please see if more attention needs to be raised. – ghosts_in_the_code Feb 4 '15 at 15:41
-
@ghosts_in_the_code, no, it did get synonymed. Notice that when you search for either you end up with the same number of questions. I found no questions with both tags. – Lance Roberts Feb 4 '15 at 15:48
-
@LanceRoberts Then why do I still get an option to use both tags on a new question? – ghosts_in_the_code Feb 4 '15 at 16:02
-
@ghosts_in_the_code, there does appear to be a bug, see my larger meta question that I've just posted. – Lance Roberts Feb 4 '15 at 16:30
-
1
