I'm sort of enjoying, e.g., Tom Au's recent spate of questions about Bridge: but I'm definitely starting to get the impression that he's just throwing out every possible question about the theory and practice of the game he can think of. Which is good for one's long-term reputation, I suppose: if you can cover most of the bases of a major game like Bridge, then a lot of questions in the future will have to be closed as duplicates, and the sweet, sweet reputation will all fall to you!
I have no idea if there's anything here to be offended by, though. Is asking questions that I don't urgently need to know the answer to, just because they're there, a desirable practice? It certainly keeps the site lively, which is better than the tumbleweeds that were blowing through this place a month or two back...