I'm thinking of this question:
This question isn't subjective -- some game will have the most components. But on the other hand, it's likely this question will just result in a big list of answers listing games and their component numbers. It inherently can't settle on a "right" answer because somebody else can always show up with a more obscure game with more components.
And voting for answers to this kind of question is meaningless - votes accumulate for the current "winner" in component count, but then a higher count answer is posted and it has to accumulate enough votes to pass that earlier answer.
I just don't think this kind of question makes sense in this forum.